franchise holders
franchise holders
What are a few benefits for license owners ” franchise holders “?
When you become a franchise container, you want to get some sorts of merits. Anyone investing their currency wants to know what will get nearer of their investment. You have the chance to develop your company’s affluence. You also have the chance to go comprehensive. If you’re seeking for a comprehensive network, you’ll have access to their international network.
REGULATION OF STATE VIDEO FRANCHISE HOLDERS
Sections:
5.61.010 Purpose and authority.
5.61.015 Definitions.
5.61.020 State video franchise and PEG fees.
5.61.030 Authority to examine business records.
5.61.040 Customer service penalties.
5.61.050 City response to State video franchise applications.
5.61.060 Development review for facilities in streets and public rights-of-way.
5.61.070 Construction standards.
5.61.080 Environmental review.
5.61.090 Severability.
5.61.010 Purpose and authority.
This chapter is made to normalize video service suppliers sharing State video franchises and operating within the City.
As of January 1, 2007, the State of California will have the sole influence to scholarship State video franchises pursuant to the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 (“Act”). Pursuant to the Act, the City of Poway shall get a license toll and shall receive a toll for public, educational, and government (PEG) aims from all State video license holders functioning within the City. Additionally, the City will get hold of the accountability to set up and impose penalties, dependable with State law, against all State video license holders ” franchise holders ” functioning within the City for contraventions of client service standards; however, the Act grants all weight to adopt client service standards to the State. The Act leaves unmovable the City’s say-so to regulate the City’s on going cable license in agreement with Chapter 5.60 PMC and the cable license presently in outcome until such time as the cable franchisee no longer tackles a City franchise or is no license functioning under an on going or ended City franchise. (Ord. 660 § 2, 2007)
5.61.015 Definitions.*
The terms “video,” “video franchise” and “video franchisee” shall have the same meaning as the terms “cable,” “franchise” and “grantee,” as used in Chapter 5.60 PMC. (Ord. 660 § 2, 2007)
* Editor’s Note: Ordinance 660 adds the provisions of this section as Section 5.61.010. The section has been editorially renumbered to prevent duplication of numbering.
5.61.020 State video franchise and PEG fees.
A. For any State video license proprietor in commission within the limits of the City of Poway, there shall be a toll purchased to the City equal to five percent of the vulgar revenue of that State video license manager.
B. For any State video license manager functioning within the limits of the City of Poway, there shall be an extra charge purchased to the City equal to one percent of the gross revenue of that State video license holder, which shall be compulsory under the terms and conditions set forth in the Act. This charge shall be employed by the City for PEG purposes consistent with State and Federal law.
C. “Gross revenue,” for the aims of subsections A and B of this section, shall have the description set forth in California Public Utilities Code Section 5860. (Ord. 660 § 2, 2007)
5.61.030 Authority to test trade files.
Not more than once yearly, the City Manager or his or her designee may scrutinize the trade history of a proprietor of a State video license to make certain acquiescence with PMC 5.61.020, under the franchise holders terms and conditions set forth in the Act. (Ord. 660 § 2, 2007)
5.61.040 Customer service penalties.
A. The holder of a State video license shall fulfill with all related State and Federal customer service and fortification standards pertaining to the condition of video service.
B. The City Manager shall watch the obedience of State video license holders with deference to State and Federal client service and fortification standards. The City Manager will provide the State video license holder written notice of any material breaks of appropriate clients service norms, and will permit the State video license holder 30 days from the reception of the take in to preparation the specified material break. Material breaches not improved within the 30-day time duration will be theme to the coming penalties to be forced upon by the City:
1. For the first happening of a contravention, a fine of $500.00 shall be forced upon for each day the contravention remains in outcome, not to go over $1,500 for each contravention.
2. For a second contravention of the same nature within 12 months, a fine of $1,000 shall be forced upon for each day the contravention keeps in effect, not to exceed $3,000 for each contravention.
3. For a third or more contravention of the same nature within 12 months, a fine of $2,500 shall be forced upon for each day the contravention remains in consequence, not to exceed $7,500 for each abuse.
C. A State video license owner may application a punishment evaluated by the City Manager to the City Council within 60 days of the initial evaluation. The City Council shall hear all confirmation and pertinent indication and may maintain, adjust or give up the price. The City Council’s result on the obligation of a punishment shall be closing. (Ord. 660 § 2, 2007)
5.61.050 City response to State video franchise applications.
A. plaintiffs for State video franchises within the limits of the City of Poway must in tandem supply entire copies to the City of any function or alteration to applications filed with the Public Utilities Commission. One complete copy must be supplied to the City Manager.
B. Within 30 days of delivery, the City Manager will supply any apt comments to the PUC concerning a submission or an adjustment to an submission for a State video license. (Ord. 660 § 2, 2007)
5.61.060 Development review for facilities in streets and public rights-of-way.
